“How
is Bank Performance Affected by Functional Distance” is an article whose
purpose is to confirm the presence of a relationship between the territory and
the bank. Its main goal was to verify
the effect of functional distance and bank performance. The article defines functional distance as “the
distance between a local system and a bank. It considers all the banks which,
although physically closer to customers of a certain area, have their own decision-making
and policy center away from it (Alessandrini, Croci and Zazzaro, 2005).” To support the idea above, several variables
were tested to see the effects on performance.
Such variables include bank size, intensity of labor factor, and bank
type to name a few. This study was
tested over a period ranging from 2005 to 2008.
The sample size was close to 3,000 Italian banks. Furthermore, a multivariate regression model
was used where the dependent variable was Performance and many independent
variables. The results were charted in many different charts.
H1:
There is a strong association between functional distance and bank performance.
H2:
There is a significant negative association between bank performance and
foreign control of banks.
H3:
The association between bank performance and intensity of labor is strong.
H4:
There is a negative relation between bank performance and typology of bank
(joint stock banks, local cooperative banks, national cooperative banks).
Data
collected support the four hypotheses. I
will go over H1. The article states the
following: “According to the results, bank performance is affected in a
negative way by increasing distance between the “thinking head” of the bank and
its branches. The inevitable costs of monitoring, the less and worse capacity
for the screening if distant customers, the difficulty of transferring efficiency
to branches further way, and informational disadvantage, certainly have a
negative impact on bank performance.” In
different words, the article is trying to state that the more distant banks are
from each other, the higher the costs to maintain that bank. Furthermore, it is
difficult to screen customers for their credibility. We do live in a nation that is full of fraud
and sometimes fraud is hard to detect. I, personally, believe that small banks
are better and work more efficiently than large banks. I say this from personal
experience and because I am a small business owner that had bad experiences
with large banks. At the same time,
large banks are probably great for big companies that provide all the necessary
documents to pass creditworthiness.
For
practicing managers, I would have to say that this is a topic that is really
important. I did not go over every variable that was analyzed in this study but
they all seemed very important to me. If a manager is in the banking business,
I do believe that he/she will need to review studies like this especially if it
is a large bank that has several branches worldwide. The article discusses the
importance of ROA (return on assets) and the effect of functional distance on
many different levels. All things need to be considered especially in the
banking business. Money is the most
liquid asset available to all of us and as a manager; he/she needs to make sure
that a bank is not put into a bad financial position. It is the responsibility of the manager to
communicate well with upper management if he/she feels that things are not
good.
Giuseppe Torluccio and Matteo Cotugno and
Stefania Strizzi, “How is Bank Performance Affected by Functional
Distance?”. European Journal of Economic, Finance and Administrative Sciences; Oct
2011, Issue 39, p79-93, 15p, 4 charts
Alessandrini, P., Croci, M., Zazzaro, A., 2005. “The
geography of banking power: the role of functional distance”, BNL Quarterly Review 235, pp. 129-167.
It would make sense that it costs a bank more to operate when its locations are far away from each other or far from the customer. Although most business can be done online and not necessarily needing to be physically carried out, costs can still be high. If staff or property has to be relocated expenses can rise due to distance. Location of banks plays a big role as well. People are now looking at banks that are closer to work and home and will become members for convenience of location.
ReplyDeleteI prefer to use bigger banks myself. After the financial crisis, I just feel that they have a better chance of not going bankrupt. I did choose my bank because it is close to my house and when I move I will change banks if my current bank is not right by the house.
ReplyDeleteI currently bank with a local credit union that is near to my home. The proximity is a main reason as to why I choose to bank with them. Since the financial crisis, banks are looking for ways to retain and keep customers loyal. Having a main branch near to a sub-branch is a way that they can achieve this while keeping costs low.
ReplyDeleteI dont think they are talkin about a local branch verses a branch far away. I think this article is more about the idea of local branches being governed by corporate headquarters far far away. That is the problem with every big business and banks are no different.
ReplyDelete