Monday, July 16, 2012

Business Analysis - Implementation of Worksplace


Business Analysis - Implementation of Workplace-Based Smoking Cessation Support Activities and Smoking Cessation Among Employees: The Finnish Public Sector Study

The purpose of this article is to raise awareness of how workplaces promote smoking cessation.  As we know, smoking bans has been implemented in many places over the years. The smoking bans prohibit an individual from smoking in public places such as restaurants, bars, school property and workplaces. These smoke bans were put into place to reduce the exposure of second-hand smoke and to help the smokers to stop smoking.

This is an important issue because years ago individuals were allowed to smoke in public places and they did not consider the health of other people.  Now, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are working to help implement such studies in workplaces. “Beyond workplace smoking restrictions and campaigns to reduce smoking, employers offer various types of support for smoking cessation, including support groups, nicotine replacement therapy, other pharmacological treatments, and financial incentives.”

According to the article, “they investigated the relationship between implementation of workplace smoking cessation support activities and employee smoking cessation.”  There were 2 studies that were conducted in Finland on employees in 10 municipalities and 21 hospitals.  There were many things that they had to consider such as number of cigarettes smoked per day, shift work, health status and work unit size to name a few.

In conclusion if financial and pharmacological treatments were offered by the employers it would encourage the employees to stop smoking.  I think if managers offer the necessary incentives, that more people will quit smoking. A smoker needs that support to help them kick the habit.

Kouvonen A, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, et al. Implementation of Workplace-Based Smoking Cessation Support Activities and Smoking Cessation Among Employees: The Finnish Public Sector St. American Journal Of Public Health [serial online]. July 2012;102(7):e56-e62. Available from: Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed July 12, 2012.




3 comments:

  1. Smoking is really bad, especially in public. The reason is not the smoker but people around the smoker. I dont know how serious or how much the smoker could get when smoking but definitely the person has to breath in smelly moke and easily get sick and even more serious than smoker. I encourage every single place to have non-smoking policy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Offering incentives at work to quit smoking sounds like a pretty good idea. It shows the company is genuinely concerned about their employee's health and is willing to take the necessary actions in order to help them quit if they're truly interested in quitting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Most employers are interested in getting their employees to stop smoking primarily for insurance savings. There is nothing wrong with that. Both parties benefit if the employer is successful. I think if all the cost were past to the employee, such as a plan you must pay a premium over other employees if you smoke, then less initiative would be taken by employers to take action. I am sure there might be exceptions to the rule, and there are employers that are just being socially responsible.

    ReplyDelete