Booz Allen Hamilton is an American consulting firm that
administers the Global Innovation 1000, a survey of the world’s 1000 biggest
research and development spenders.
The article begins by discussing the effects of companies
being able to spend more on research and development as opposed to those that
cannot. It states that if companies continue to spend more on R&D, their
financial performance would get better.
Although Booz Allen’s vice president himself has claimed this, their
actual findings say otherwise. Findings indicate that there is no correlation
between how much a company spends on R&D and corporate financial
performance. So how do companies like Apple and Google continue to underspend
in R&D in comparison to their competitors and still manage to have
innovative success?
According to Global Innovation 1000 results, the answer lies
in strategic alignment, “the degree to which innovation efforts are driven by
and emerge from the overall corporate strategy and corporate culture.” (Gobble
63) Innovators must step back and see the broader picture and be able to decide
how their innovations fit in with the corporate structure. They need to have an
understanding of strategy to try and figure out what will work and what won’t
work.
The article then goes on to discuss Michael Porter’s core
concepts: the five forces model, the value chain model, and competitive
advantage. In Porter’s mind, success is measured in profits and not about which
company is the best. The author goes on to discuss about the importance of the
value chain model and how the success of a company is directly tied with
suppliers, customers and collaborators.
There are those who view Porter’s value chain model as irrelevant
in today’s world. With the way social media has evolved, the relationship
between consumer and companies has changed as well. The author goes on to argue that although the
value chain model may seem irrelevant, it is still needed in a companies
corporate structure. It may not be the same as Porter’s model but every company
has one and must understand it if they are to be successful. In the end the
author suggest that innovators need to understand strategy in order to be able
to mold it in a way that will benefit their corporate structure.
- Source:
- Research Technology Management; May/Jun2012, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p63-67, 5p
I have to agree with the author of this article, having a value chain is important in the corporate end of business. It is also true that social media has changed the way we do business.
ReplyDeleteI would like to comment on the two companies you mentioned in the blog. Google and Apple are able to continually out preform on R&D because they attract the greatest talent. This is a result of one of the topics the article is emphasizing, corporate culture. Once the talent is there they are also a part of an environment that is very horizontal, allowing for streamlined idea implementation, which is a result of corporate structure.
ReplyDelete